Rules in MMA compared to rules in ufc 1

[graciesrock]

Does anyone agree that the rules in :rolleyes: MMA today , are more of a sport as opposed to the few rules involved in the 1st U.F.C ? :twisted:

[themunchies]

yes.

Is that all?

[just Brian]

Does anyone agree that the rules in :rolleyes: MMA today , are more of a sport as opposed to the few rules involved in the 1st U.F.C ? :twisted:

Man, that's just crazy talk. That's just a bit too controversial, questions like that could get you banned.

[D241]

I am appalled with this topic and it's graphic nature. There was no hints in the subject line about violent/mature content, and I reccommend a mod delete this post.

to answere the question, yes, it's not just a spectacle anymore.

[Lefty]

if the rules never changed from ufc 1, mma would probably be banned in N.america. the ufc would probably be held in budapest and evander holyfield would be the reigning champ with his signature headbutts.

[nhbfan8080]

Does anyone agree that the rules in :rolleyes: MMA today , are more of a sport as opposed to the few rules involved in the 1st U.F.C ? :twisted:


The early UFC was already a sport.

In a real streetfight, there wouldn't be a cage and competitors would not have time to change into a pair of white pajamas.

[Grappling-fan]

graciesrock= troll