Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Page 10 of 23 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 224
  1. #91
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    66,301

    Default

    More on why the judges threw her appeal out

    http://m.now.msn.com/stacie-halas-kn...job-as-teacher

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Repent Ash, repent!

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    29,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spectre View Post
    1. You used to, you uncultured, historically illiterate nincompoop.

    2. Simple question: If Porn weren't socially stigmatized to the point of preventing employment, would she have lied about it?
    I can't say. I'd assume no - but I have no idea.

    Regardless - that's invalid because it isn't the case. Again - you're bringing in a fantasy world and complaining about society and that's not what we're arguing about it (or at least what I'm not arguing about).

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    29,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spectre View Post
    Because you're dumb. You can compare the two, but the state treats them differently, which is why your whining of "DAS ILLEGAL!!!!!" Was silly.

    Maybe it's comparable, but she didn't do any explicitly illegal activity, anymore than the liquor store owner who occasionally has some of his liquor sold to minors. Game.Set.Match.
    Except the state clearly states that when you exchange sex for money - and when there is a reasonable expectation of that happening - it's illegal. Which is EXACTLY WHAT SHE WAS DOING. Unless you're going to be naive and put your fingers in your ears and assume she just accompanied men on dinner dates.

    The liquor store argument is irrelevant and has nothing to do with this conversation. It's a bland comparison thought up by a halfwit - it doesn't apply here. If a liquor store owner sold to minors, was found out, and applied to be a teacher - he'd have a tough time keeping his job if he was caught lying about it too.

  4. #94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BulldogWrestler View Post
    You're fvcking moronic man.
    I think Juggs has well established that he is exactly this here in the thread.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. #95

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BulldogWrestler View Post
    Except she did porn all the way up until late 2008 (according to the news, I don't have any links or research to back that up). So you're timeline there is a bit skewed.
    ACCORDING TO OP: "Schwab has said Halas did not star in pornographic movies while teaching in any district. He said she took parts only during an eight-month period from 2005 to 2006 because of financial problems after her boyfriend abandoned her. "

    So either you're a worthless liar, or you have to provide those links. Hurry up.

    Also, teaching as a pseudonym doesn't work when you look exactly like the person getting railed on the internet.
    Yes, because as we all know, little 6th graders are all going to go back through the archives of obscure porn sites to find 2005 level material.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  6. #96

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BulldogWrestler View Post
    I can't say. I'd assume no - but I have no idea.
    So she lied because of a social stigma. Is that social stigma fair, and does it override the evidence that she was a good teacher?

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  7. #97

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BulldogWrestler View Post
    Except the state clearly states that when you exchange sex for money - and when there is a reasonable expectation of that happening - it's illegal. .
    What's your evidence that she was prostituting, and why haven't you put this into the public record, under you own real name?

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  8. #98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cbear View Post
    More on why the judges threw her appeal out

    http://m.now.msn.com/stacie-halas-kn...job-as-teacher
    None of that is anything that hasn't been posted in the thread old man, keep up!

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  9. #99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thumpin View Post
    I think Juggs has well established that he is exactly this here in the thread.
    That's right, when in doubt, join your fellow conservatives in ad hominem attacks. I'm sure that group therapy session will pay off eventually!

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    29,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spectre View Post
    ACCORDING TO OP: "Schwab has said Halas did not star in pornographic movies while teaching in any district. He said she took parts only during an eight-month period from 2005 to 2006 because of financial problems after her boyfriend abandoned her. "

    So either you're a worthless liar, or you have to provide those links. Hurry up.



    Yes, because as we all know, little 6th graders are all going to go back through the archives of obscure porn sites to find 2005 level material.
    Not a worthless liar. Just saying what I've already been told. However, if you google "Tiffany Six videography" - you'll see movies that were released up to 2009. Not sure they would sit on 3 year old material for releases for someone who wasn't a big name in porn.

    And yes, 6th graders are. All it takes is one kid to stumble across it. It obviously already happened, so for you to discount the plausibility of it is absurd.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •