Should this Porno star be aloud to teach?

[Cbear]

More on why the judges threw her appeal out

http://m.now.msn.com/stacie-halas-kn...job-as-teacher

[BulldogWrestler]

1. You used to, you uncultured, historically illiterate nincompoop.

2. Simple question: If Porn weren't socially stigmatized to the point of preventing employment, would she have lied about it?

I can't say. I'd assume no - but I have no idea.

Regardless - that's invalid because it isn't the case. Again - you're bringing in a fantasy world and complaining about society and that's not what we're arguing about it (or at least what I'm not arguing about).

[BulldogWrestler]

Because you're dumb. You can compare the two, but the state treats them differently, which is why your whining of "DAS ILLEGAL!!!!!" Was silly.

Maybe it's comparable, but she didn't do any explicitly illegal activity, anymore than the liquor store owner who occasionally has some of his liquor sold to minors. Game.Set.Match.

Except the state clearly states that when you exchange sex for money - and when there is a reasonable expectation of that happening - it's illegal. Which is EXACTLY WHAT SHE WAS DOING. Unless you're going to be naive and put your fingers in your ears and assume she just accompanied men on dinner dates.

The liquor store argument is irrelevant and has nothing to do with this conversation. It's a bland comparison thought up by a halfwit - it doesn't apply here. If a liquor store owner sold to minors, was found out, and applied to be a teacher - he'd have a tough time keeping his job if he was caught lying about it too.

[Thumpin]

You're fvcking moronic man.

I think Juggs has well established that he is exactly this here in the thread.

[Spectre]

Except she did porn all the way up until late 2008 (according to the news, I don't have any links or research to back that up). So you're timeline there is a bit skewed.

ACCORDING TO OP: "Schwab has said Halas did not star in pornographic movies while teaching in any district. He said she took parts only during an eight-month period from 2005 to 2006 because of financial problems after her boyfriend abandoned her. "

So either you're a worthless liar, or you have to provide those links. Hurry up.

Also, teaching as a pseudonym doesn't work when you look exactly like the person getting railed on the internet.

Yes, because as we all know, little 6th graders are all going to go back through the archives of obscure porn sites to find 2005 level material.

[Spectre]

I can't say. I'd assume no - but I have no idea.

So she lied because of a social stigma. Is that social stigma fair, and does it override the evidence that she was a good teacher?

[Spectre]

Except the state clearly states that when you exchange sex for money - and when there is a reasonable expectation of that happening - it's illegal. .

What's your evidence that she was prostituting, and why haven't you put this into the public record, under you own real name?

[Spectre]

More on why the judges threw her appeal out

http://m.now.msn.com/stacie-halas-kn...job-as-teacher

None of that is anything that hasn't been posted in the thread old man, keep up!

[Spectre]

I think Juggs has well established that he is exactly this here in the thread.

That's right, when in doubt, join your fellow conservatives in ad hominem attacks. I'm sure that group therapy session will pay off eventually!

[BulldogWrestler]

ACCORDING TO OP: "Schwab has said Halas did not star in pornographic movies while teaching in any district. He said she took parts only during an eight-month period from 2005 to 2006 because of financial problems after her boyfriend abandoned her. "

So either you're a worthless liar, or you have to provide those links. Hurry up.



Yes, because as we all know, little 6th graders are all going to go back through the archives of obscure porn sites to find 2005 level material.

Not a worthless liar. Just saying what I've already been told. However, if you google "Tiffany Six videography" - you'll see movies that were released up to 2009. Not sure they would sit on 3 year old material for releases for someone who wasn't a big name in porn.

And yes, 6th graders are. All it takes is one kid to stumble across it. It obviously already happened, so for you to discount the plausibility of it is absurd.