I know, it's not a big deal in the US. I sort of figure it's the same with baseball here. But yes, beer goes great with soccer. Me and the friend I go to live matches with brought along a Brit who only watched rugby and didn't really like soccer. We brought him along for the biggest match in Danish football between the two major Copenhagen clubs and beer mixed with being at the supporters stand made the whole thing quite the party, he really enjoyed it. But yeah, I'm a soccerholic, I hate the summer breaks where there are no matches on the weekends.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Oh I don't give two shïts about the Danish national soccer team, fück 'em. My view on this is that there are many players on the national team that play in clubs I dislike and because of that I can't get myself to cheer for them in tournaments that I don't really care about. I'm a die hard fan of FC Copenhagen (the local team) and I follow Arsenal from London in England, and that's it.
Speaking about the Canadian team Denmark just a couple of weeks ago beat Canada 4-0 so I know about the quality of your national teamA Canadian did play for Copenhagen though and did very well, he was very popular here.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
but you guys have those siiiiiiiiiiiiick Orange uniforms!!!! How can you not like them?
I'm a soccerholic but for booze.
"He does lots of weird zen crap and philosophies to keep himself grounded." Thekillerkiwi
More fights is ultimately a good thing.
When the UFC started pushing more cards out, people were saying the same thing:
Too many events.
I cannot watch all of them.
Too many fights with fighters I do not know or care about.
They should scale back to <whatever quantity of fights it is I can be bothered to watch>.
I disagree.
The UFC cannot build its event calendar based on only putting out a number of events that hardcore fans can watch every card and every fight. That applies to the number of events, and it applies to the number of fights on the card. About the only concession I make to over saturation arguments is that the UFC should avoid running multiple PPV events too close together.
Putting on more fights per fight card is great. The only downside is the visual of a mostly empty arena for the first few fights. The upside is that they get more fights without having to plan extra events. If an early prelim is boring, no harm is done. But if the early prelim kicked ass, the UFC often squeezes it into the PPV or televised prelims if the fights are ending fast.
Also, more fights per card means more flexibility in dealing with fights being cancelled due to fighter injury.
No one is strapping you into a chair and making you watch the fights you do not care about. When you have had enough to eat, walk away from the table.
END COMMUNICATION
Reminds me of this:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/im-...r-booze,10739/
END COMMUNICATION