1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>3>who cares.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Huh, I did not know that.
アッシュ
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Yeah. Another fun factoid is that "Die Hard" was supposed to originally star Sinatra (at 80 years old or however old he was) but Sinatra declined. Then they went through a who's who of action stars (literally 20 or so) before "settling" on Bruce Willis because no one else wanted the role.
Die Hard 2 was the worst of the first three. The first was awesome(I just watched it two days ago in Starz) the third is good until the end, the second and fourth were ****ty but I've seen worse. Is the new one at least a 3/10?
It seems like everyone agrees that the original Die Hard is a great film, but I'm a little surprised at the disdain for Harlan's follow up. Sure it's cheesy in spots and not nearly the movie that Die Hard was, but it's entertaining. Likewise Die Hard with a Vengeance. I've never been a fan of Live Free or Die Hard, but when put in context with the new one it looks great.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
I suspected it was going to suck when it got a Feb slot instead of summer. Ill still watch it though.